【禁聞】茅於軾遭公訴 民眾呼籲電視直播

【新唐人2011年5月26日訊】著名自由主義經濟學家茅於軾4月底發表《把毛澤東還原成人》一文後，大陸左派人士在網上表示要求公訴茅於軾先生。大陸律師認為，這種做法不符合當前國內法律。民眾中有人希望藉此公開歷史真相，法庭審理最好能用電視全程直播。

今年4月27號，著名自由主義經濟學家茅於軾，對中共黨史學者辛子陵的《紅太陽的隕落－－千秋功罪毛澤東》一書，發表了讀後感文章----《把毛澤東還原成人》，文章指出，毛澤東對幾千萬中國人非正常死亡，以及傳統文化被破壞負有責任。文章發表後，被大量網友轉載。

5月23號，大陸左派網站“烏有之鄉”，登出針對茅於軾和辛子陵的所謂公訴書。發起者包括毛澤東的親屬。他們指稱茅於軾詆譭中共和毛本人，意在顛覆國家和煽動動亂。

北京憶通律師事務所 劉曉原律師：“法律上是沒有這種公訴團的程序形式的，並且作為一個普通的民主是不能提起公訴。公訴是檢查機關的責任，因為檢察機關是代表國家。他們不可能進入法律程序，除非他們提出控告。”

劉曉原律師判斷，這些人很明顯是大造輿論，引發社會關注，但方式上，讓人很容易想起文革中的造反派。

中共黨史學者林保華指出，毛澤東死後30多年，中國民眾中還有左派憤青，是因為當局一直阻止全民認識歷史真相。

林保華（中共黨史學者）：“中國是（要）『非毛化』，還是要堅持毛澤東的那些東西，在黨內沒有解決，在社會上也沒有解決。你全部否定，那證明他是大壞蛋，那他後面這些人也都是壞蛋了，所以，它（中共）在根本問題上要保住毛澤東。”

中共前黨魁毛澤東從1935年遵義會議起，到1976年去世，一直是中共實際上的最高領導人。在此期間，中國人非正常死亡人數為7000多萬。1949年到1976年期間，中共連續發動多次政治運動。僅「文革」中，中國就有一半的家庭受到了傷害。

中共前總書記趙紫陽的秘書 鮑彤：“茅於軾先生批評毛澤東，我覺得是好事；《烏有之鄉》告到法院去，也是好事情；法院如果不受理，是好事情；如果受理也是好事情，公開審判，辯方、控方大家把意見拿出來，不都是好事情嗎？好極了！”

就在毛左派提出要公訴茅於軾之際，《新浪》網微博上出現了一張“毛澤東懺悔像”。一座古銅色的毛澤東雕像----雙膝下跪，右手撫胸，表情懺悔的樣子。

林保華認為，既然毛左派要公訴，最好是電視直播法庭審理的全過程，讓中國老百姓都知道毛澤東的真實情況。

林保華：“我想毛澤東的罪名要列出來，幾本書都寫不完。它（中共）敢不敢電視都播放出來，讓大家都看，共產黨不敢，因為全都播出來，共產黨就要完蛋了！”

新唐人記者梁欣、趙心知、吳慧真採訪報導。

Indictment Against Mao Yushi

Renowned liberal economist Mao Yushi was called

for a public prosecution by Chinese leftists

due to his article 『Unveil Mao Zedong』s True Face.』

According to Chinese lawyers, such a prosecution

is groundless. People in China hope to hear the truth

from history and see the court trials live on TV.

On April 27, liberal economist Mao Yushi published

his 『Unveil Mao Zedong』s True Face,』 responding

to CCP (Chinese Communist Party) scholar

Xin Zilin』s 『Merits and Demerits of Mao Zedong,』

a book revealing the truth of Mao』s massacre

of millions of Chinese people and destruction

of traditional Chinese culture. This book

was reprinted massively after its publication.

Chinese leftist site, Utopia, published on May 23,

an indictment against Mao Yushi and Xin Zilin.

Mao』s relatives also contributed to the indictment.

They accused Yushi of defaming CCP and Mao

and subversion of state power, leading to unrest.

Liu Xiaoyuan (Beijing lawyer): “In the law,

there is no procedure for such a prosecution group,

and ordinary citizens can not issue an indictment.

It is the supervision department』s responsibility

to issue an indictment, as it represents the country.

They have to indict before going to law procedures.”

Lawyer Liu Xiaoyuan thinks they intentionally draw

media attention in a Cultural Revolution manner.

CCP historian Lin Baohua noted that after 30 years

of Mao Zedong』s death, leftists remain evident

among Chinese people due to CCP』 battle to prevent

the public from knowing the true history.

Lin Baohua: “To promote or deny Mao』s principles

is still a dilemma within the CCP and the society.

Full denial of Mao would mean Mao and followers

are proved wrong, therefore CCP is inclined

to continue covering up Mao』s true face.”

Mao Zedong has been the top leader of CCP

from Zunyi』s meeting in 1935 to his death in 1976.

In the interim 70 million Chinese people were killed,

and political movements were constantly held

from 1949 to 1976. Half of the Chinese families

were affected during the Cultural Revolution alone.

Pao Tong (secretary of ex-CCP leader Zhao Ziyang):

“It is good that Mao Yushi criticizes Mao Zedong,

and that Utopia goes to the court as well.

It would be good if the court refuses the case,

and if accepts it, this would also be a good,

as the trial process will be under public scrutiny,

which is just what we want.”

A picture, 『Mao Zedong In Repentance』 appeared

on Sina.com when the leftists made their indictment.

It features a bronze statue of Mao on his knees,

with his right hand on the chest, in deep repentance.

Lin Baohua said to the leftists that if indictments are

to be made, it is best to be done on live TV with

the whole court process exposed to the public eye.

Lin Baohua: “If Mao』s sins are to be itemized,

it would take loads of books to get it done.

CCP won』t dare do this,

as if this is ever published, CCP will be done for.”

NTD reporters Liang Xin ,Zhao Xinzhi and Wu Huizhen